GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Radeon E4690 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
+1171%
4884
Radeon E4690 MXM
384
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1455 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
320
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
76.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
152.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
9.769 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.884 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
152.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
30W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690
(215-0729055)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1