GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1335MHz vs 1266MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
4101
Radeon E9550 MXM
+42%
5834
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
2304
96
TMUs
144
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
95W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4