GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1368 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+15609%
5027
FirePro 2450 Multi View
32
Graphics Card
Oct 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
40
88
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
125W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
RV620
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1