Home Comparison GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R7 260X

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R7 260X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 115W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +51%
2984
Radeon R7 260X
1971
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 +141%
3566
Radeon R7 260X
1476

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
896
56
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
115W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Bonaire
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net