GeForce GTX 1650 vs FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+500%
2984
FireStream 9170
497
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV670
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
