GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs GeForce 410M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1485MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+2664%
3041
GeForce 410M
110
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+5005%
3676
GeForce 410M
72
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1485 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.148 GPixel/s
95.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.592 GTexel/s
6.083 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.041 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
110.1 GFLOPS
95.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.176 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
12W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GF119
N18P-G61
GPU Variant
N12M-GS
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
