GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs FirePro M8900
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1485MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+132%
3041
FirePro M8900
1306
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Apr 2011
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1485 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
960
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
95.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
6.083 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.041 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
95.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Blackcomb
N18P-G61
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0