GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R9 M275
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1200MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+107%
2458
Radeon R9 M275
1184
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Venus
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Venus XTX
(216-0846033)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)