GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon E6465
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM Radeon E6465 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
Radeon E6465 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+1180%
2458
Radeon E6465
192
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Sep 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
160
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Caicos
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
