GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce 820M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce 820M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.83GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
GeForce 820M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+295%
2458
GeForce 820M
622
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+1540%
3150
GeForce 820M
192
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 800M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
901 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.83GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.480 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.92 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
25.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
45W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK107
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
