Home Comparison GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (2250MHz vs 1725MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +421%
23040

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 16
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
40
1280
Shading Units
5120
80
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
AD104
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net