GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock1725MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+252%
15560
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
22 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
