GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 285W)
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2610MHz vs 1725MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
+898%
44100
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jun 2024
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
2340 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
66
1280
Shading Units
8448
80
TMUs
264
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
285W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
AD102
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
