GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GT 430
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1184 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 430 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+1541%
4416
GeForce GT 430
269
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+3137%
4694
GeForce GT 430
145
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+3472%
2072
GeForce GT 430
58
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Oct 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
2
1280
Shading Units
96
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
49W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GF108
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GF108-300-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
