GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 200W)
Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (2200MHz vs 1725MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
Arc A780
+308%
18020
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
2200 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
200W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
DG2-512
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
