Home Comparison GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Radeon E9172 MXM

GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Radeon E9172 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Radeon E9172 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1515MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Radeon E9172 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile +148%
3103
Radeon E9172 MXM
1248

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2017
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1380 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
1515 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

48.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
96.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
6.205 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
3.103 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
96.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Lexa
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
E9170
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net