GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Radeon Pro Duo
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 350W)
Radeon Pro Duo 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2849
Radeon Pro Duo
+187%
8192
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
3566
Radeon Pro Duo
+40%
5028
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
1607
Radeon Pro Duo
+49%
2406
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Apr 2016
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
350W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Capsaicin
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.0