GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Quadro FX 4000 SDI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Apr 2004
GeForce 16
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
NV41
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
