GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs GeForce GTX 280
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 236W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+358%
2849
GeForce GTX 280
622
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
30
896
Shading Units
240
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
236W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT200
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
