GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs GeForce MX330
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (1594MHz vs 1139MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
+19%
1458
GeForce MX330
1224
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
+108%
2214
GeForce MX330
1060
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
+723%
1038
GeForce MX330
126
Graphics Card
Jan 2018
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 10 Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
1139 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
3
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
18.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
45.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
22.78 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
1458 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
45.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
10W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GP108
N17P-G0-A1
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1
(N17S-G3-A1)
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
