GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 80.26GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
711
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+423%
3723
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 700M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1254 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.26GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
384
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.408 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
29.63 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
711.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
29.63 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
250W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
Amethyst
N14P-GT
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
5 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3