GeForce GT 520MX vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520MX and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 520MX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520MX
173
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+1320%
2458
Graphics Card
May 2011
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 500M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
16
48
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
14.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF119
GPU Name
TU117
N12P-GVR-B-A1
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
