GeForce GT 240 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 300W)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
18080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
257
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+35331%
91060
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 240
423
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+6103%
26240
Graphics Card
Nov 2009
Release Date
Dec 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
12
SM Count
142
96
Shading Units
18176
32
TMUs
568
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
69W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
AD102
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
