GeForce GT 240 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 70W)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
257
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+4569%
12000
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 240
423
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1826%
8147
Graphics Card
Nov 2009
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
12
SM Count
22
96
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
69W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
AD107
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
