GeForce GT 240 vs Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 225W)
Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
257
Arc A770
+7549%
19660
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 240
423
Arc A770
+3105%
13560
Graphics Card
Nov 2009
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
69W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
DG2-512
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
