GeForce GT 1030 vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1030 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 1030 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1468MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 1030
+12%
1127
FireStream 9250
1000
Graphics Card
May 2017
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 10
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1228 MHz
Base Clock
-
1468 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
23.49 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
35.23 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
17.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1127 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
35.23 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP108
GPU Name
RV770
GP108-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
