GeForce 9800 GT vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 9800 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 285W)
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
8336 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9800 GT
336
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
+13025%
44100
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Jun 2024
GeForce 9
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2340 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
66
112
Shading Units
8448
56
TMUs
264
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
33.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
336.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
285W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
AD102
G92-280-B1
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
