GeForce 940M vs Arc Pro A60M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 940M and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 940M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)
Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1300MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 940M
1124
Arc Pro A60M
+373%
5325
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce 900M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
512
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
35.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
1124 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
35.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
95W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
DG2-256
N16S-GT1-KB-B
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
Unknown
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
