GeForce 930M vs RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 930M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 930M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 125% (2115MHz vs 941MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 930M
723
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1696%
12990
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 930M
449
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1499%
7180
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce 930M
145
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+2472%
3730
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 900M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
928 MHz
Base Clock
1635 MHz
941 MHz
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
22.58 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
22.58 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
AD107
N16S-GM
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
