GeForce 6200 X2 PCI vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 6200 X2 PCI and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 6 PCI
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3.200GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
Shading Units
800
4
TMUs
40
2
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
560.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
1.120 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
NV44
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Curie
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
110 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
Shader Model
4.1