GeForce 6200 X2 PCI vs Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 6200 X2 PCI and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 6 PCI
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
200 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3.200GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
2
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
560.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
1.120 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
NV44
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Curie
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
110 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
