Home Comparison GeForce 310M vs RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

GeForce 310M vs RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 100W)
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
49
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation +32185%
15820

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 300M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1110 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
40
16
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
247.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.82 TFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
247.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

14W
TDP
100W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD104
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net