GeForce 310M vs Radeon R7 A265
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock825MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
49
Radeon R7 A265
+1191%
633
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 300M
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
825 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Opal
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
Opal XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
