GeForce 305M vs Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 305M and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 305M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 95W)
Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 305M
37
Radeon E9550 MXM
+15667%
5834
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 300M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
4.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
36.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
95W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Ellesmere
N11M-LP1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
