GeForce 210 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 130W)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
6128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
39
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+68438%
26730
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 210
285
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+4931%
14340
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
160bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
48
16
Shading Units
6144
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
AD104
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
