GeForce 210 vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (17W vs 31W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
39
FirePro 2460 Multi View
+105%
80
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
80
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
32 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
17W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Cedar
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
