GeForce 210 vs FireGL V5600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 210 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 89W)
FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
104 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
39
FireGL V5600
+392%
192
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
120
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
89W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
RV630
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
