GeForce 210 vs Arc A580
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 8GB VRAM Arc A580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 175W)
Arc A580 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
39
Arc A580
+31412%
12290
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 210
285
Arc A580
+3708%
10855
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Oct 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 5)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1700 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
24
32 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.536 TFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
DG2-512
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
