GeForce 210 vs Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 31W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
39
Arc A310
+6792%
2688
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 210
285
Arc A310
+974%
3061
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
DG2-128
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
