FireStream 9250 vs Xe DG1 SDV
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Xe DG1 SDV to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Xe DG1 SDV 's Advantages
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Xe DG1 SDV
+130%
2304
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
Xe Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.304 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
576.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI
3x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
DG1
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
Unknown
256 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
