FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 17 years late
Boost Clock3130MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (322.3GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB
+2464%
25640
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2025
FireStream
Generation
Navi IV
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1700 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3130 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
322.3GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
32
-
SM Count
132
800
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
200.3 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
400.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
51.28 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.64 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
801.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
2x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 44
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 44 XT 8GB
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
29.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
199 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
9.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
