FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX 7950 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
4576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon RX 7950 XT
+6351%
64510
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
84
800
Shading Units
5376
40
TMUs
336
16
ROPs
192
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 31
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
