FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX 7800 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 263W)
Radeon RX 7800 XT 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon RX 7800 XT
+3632%
37320
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2023
FireStream
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
60
800
Shading Units
3840
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
96
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
583.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
74.65 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.32 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1166 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
263W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 32
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 32 XT
(215-180000006)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
