FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro VII
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro VII to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Radeon Pro VII 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon Pro VII
+1206%
13060
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2020
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
60
800
Shading Units
3840
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
408.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.11 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.06 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.528 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Vega 20
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT WS
(215-0914026)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
