FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3060 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
+1520%
16200
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2020
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
38
800
Shading Units
4864
40
TMUs
152
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
152
-
RT Cores
38
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.2 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
253.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.20 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.20 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
253.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA104
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GA104-200-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
