FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 2080
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 215W)
GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce RTX 2080
+907%
10070
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2018
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1515 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
46
800
Shading Units
2944
40
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
368
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
109.4 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
314.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.14 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.07 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
314.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
215W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
TU104
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
TU104-400A-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
