FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
160 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+38%
1389
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2014
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1020 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
640
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.40 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1389 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GM107
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GM107-400-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1