FireStream 9250 vs GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+2122%
1000
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
45
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
800
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GT218
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1