FireStream 9250 vs GeForce 8800 GTS 320
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+338%
1000
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
228
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2007
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
800
Shading Units
96
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
143W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
G80
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
