FirePro W4170M vs RTX A2000 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1207MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4170M
691
RTX A2000 Max Q
+794%
6180
Graphics Card
Apr 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
682 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
95W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Opal
GPU Name
GA107
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.8
